KINKLE v. KINKLE

No. 97-61.

83 Ohio St.3d 150 (1998)

KINKLE ET AL., CO-EXECUTORS, APPELLEES, v. KINKLE, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided September 23, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brad C. Roush, for appellees.

James F. Blair and Derek A. Younkman, for appellant.


Submitted April 22, 1998 at the Seneca County Session.

PFEIFER, J.

We hold that an antenuptial agreement waiving a spouse's interest in an IRA controls over the beneficiary designation clause of an IRA contract entered into prior to the antenuptial agreement.

Appellant argues that the IRA contract, and its Massachusetts choice of law provision, should determine the disbursement of the IRA funds. Appellant argues that under Massachusetts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases