OHIO STATE BAR ASSN. v. ZUCKERMAN

No. 97-2670.

83 Ohio St.3d 148 (1998)

OHIO STATE BAR ASSOCIATION v. ZUCKERMAN.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided September 16, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William T. Monroe, Daniel J. Hughes, Eugene P. Whetzel and James Flaherty, for relator.

Mary L. Cibella, for respondent.


Per Curiam.

We adopt the findings and conclusions of the board, but believe a more severe sanction is warranted. The Disciplinary Rules are clear. No circumstance would have justified respondent's payments to Linick whether they were characterized as fees or as gifts. Respondent should have known that if Linick was to receive any portion of the fees Glidden paid to respondent, Linick was required by DR 2-107 to actually have done some work or at...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases