1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 80 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 80 Cal.Rptr.2d 147 (1998)
 

MARCUS & MILLICHAP v. HOCK INV. CO.

No. A078977.

80 Cal.Rptr.2d 147 (1998)

68 Cal.App.4th 83

MARCUS & MILLICHAP REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT BROKERAGE COMPANY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. HOCK INVESTMENT COMPANY et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

November 30, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul S. Mudrich, Marcus & Millichap, Palo Alto, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Jeffrey A. Baruh, Andrew L. Fagan, Bryant, Clohan, Eller, Maines & Baruh, LLP, Palo Alto, Kenneth W. Pritikin, Foley Mcintosh, Randall E. Kay, Pamela J. Ortiz, Kay & Tawasha, LLP, San Francisco, for Defendants and Respondents.

Certified for Partial Publication.*

PARRILLI, J.

Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Brokerage Company (Marcus & Millichap or Broker) appeals from a trial court order denying its petition to compel arbitration. We conclude the trial court correctly found there was no agreement to arbitrate the dispute at issue. Consequently, we affirm.

I

FACTS

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases