Crimmins, J.
Defendant Bird Roofing Company (hereinafter "Bird") appeals under Rule 8A of the Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A. D. A. from judgment on a count grounded in breach of implied warranty. At trial, plaintiffs Joseph S. Luiz, III and Jose A. Vargas claimed that Bird's roofing shingles were defective. Bird claims that judgment for plaintiffs is barred by the statute of limitations contained in M.G.L.c. 106, §2-725, and, alternatively, that the evidence did not warrant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
