1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 964 P.2d
  5. 964 P.2d 1081 (1998)
 

ROCHLIN v. CITY OF PORTLAND

LUBA No. 97-080; CA A102188.

964 P.2d 1081 (1998)

155 Or. App. 490

Arnold ROCHLIN, Petitioner, v. CITY OF PORTLAND and Ryan Lawrence, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 26, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arnold Rochlin, Portland, filed the briefs pro se.

Ruth M. Spetter, Senior Deputy City Attorney, filed the brief for Respondent City of Portland.

Timothy J. Sercombe, Portland, and Preston Gates & Ellis LLP filed the brief for Respondent Ryan Lawrence.

Before RIGGS, P.J., and DEITS, C.J., and LANDAU, J.

DEITS, Chief Judge.

Petitioner seeks review of LUBA's decision affirming the City of Portland planning director's approval of a combined final planned unit development (PUD) plan and final subdivision plat. We affirm.

Respondent Lawrence (respondent) submitted his final plan and plat to the city more than two but less than three years after obtaining preliminary approvals. Chapter 34 of the city code relates generally to subdivisions and requires the submission...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases