HERBST v. INVEN ASSOCIATES

Nos. 4791 S 1994 and 132 & 5402 S 1995.

35 Pa. D. & C. 4th 167 (1998)

Herbst v. Inven Associates

Common Pleas Court of Dauphin County, Pennsylvania.

March 30, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John B. Mancke, for plaintiff Monteith.

W. Scott Henning, for plaintiff Herbst.

Archie V. DiVeglia, for plaintiff Woltcheck.

Lisa M. DiBernardo, for defendants Gove.

Jennifer M. McHugh, for defendant Inven Assoc.

Robert Teplitz, for defendant Givler & Sons.

Stephen E. Geduldig, for defendant Dauphin Deposit.

BEFORE TURGEON, LEWIS AND EVANS,


TURGEON, LEWIS AND EVANS, J.J. March 30, 1998.

In each of the three above-captioned actions, the plaintiff slipped and fell on snow and ice and instituted an action against the property owner and/or the party responsible for snow and ice removal. Defendants in each action have filed summary judgment motions on the ground that the "hills and ridges" doctrine precludes plaintiffs' recovery. In turn, each plaintiff has asserted that the hills and ridges doctrine...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases