1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 79 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 79 Cal.Rptr.2d 120 (1998)
 

SAKS v. PARILLA, HUBBARD & MILITZOK

No. G018204.

79 Cal.Rptr.2d 120 (1998)

67 Cal.App.4th 565

Lawrence SAKS, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. PARILLA, HUBBARD & MILITZOK et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing November 30, 1998.

Review Denied January 27, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Love & Bosserman, Richard A. Love, Beth A. Shenfeld and Nancy E. Spero, Los Angeles, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Parilla, Militzok & Shedden, Paul H. Parilla and William A. Kozub, Irvine, for Defendants and Appellants.

OPINION

SONENSHINE, Associate Justice.

There is no need to set forth a detailed background of financial transactions leading up to Altamirco, Ltd.'s voluntary petition for chapter 11 bankruptcy. Nor must we discuss why Altamirco, its general partner, Craig Caldwell, and its legal counsel subsequently decided to initiate an adversary proceeding in the bankruptcy court to recover $1.5 million from Lawrence Saks, based on alternate theories of fraudulent conveyance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases