MATTER OF MARRIAGE OF GAYER

CC 15686; CA A90051; SC S43884.

952 P.2d 1030 (1998)

326 Or. 436

In the Matter of the MARRIAGE OF Earla Gayle GAYER, Petitioner and Scott H. Gayer, Respondent STATE of Oregon ex rel. Earla Gayle GAYER, Petitioner on Review v. Scott H. GAYER, Respondent on Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided February 20, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Russell Lipetzky, of Saucy & Lipetsky, P.C., Salem, argued the cause and filed the petition for petitioner on review.

Karen A. Feil, of Law Office of James M. Habberstad, The Dalles, argued the cause for respondent. James M. Habberstad filed the brief for respondent on review.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Jas. Adams, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed a brief on behalf of amicus curiae State of Oregon.

Before CARSON, C.J., and GILLETTE, VAN HOOMISSEN, GRABER, DURHAM and KULONGOSKI, JJ.


VAN HOOMISSEN, Justice.

The issues in this domestic relations case are whether a support obligor, who has a support arrearage, is entitled to direct how support payments will be applied and, if so, whether the obligor (father) in this case directed how his support payments would be applied. The trial court ruled that father could and did direct how some of his support payments would be applied. The Court of Appeals affirmed without opinion. In the Matter of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases