1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 27 F.Supp.2d
  5. 27 F.Supp.2d 162 (1998)
 

ARISTA TECHNOLOGIES v. ARTHUR D. LITTLE ENTERPRISES

No. CV 95-789.

27 F.Supp.2d 162 (1998)

ARISTA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. ARTHUR D. LITTLE ENTERPRISES, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. New York.

November 13, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Proskauer Rose LLP, New York, NY, for Plaintiff; Steven Kayman, Gregory S. McCurdy, of counsel.

Hamilton, Brook, Smith & Reynolds, Lexington, MA, for Defendant; David Brody, Deirdre Sanders, of counsel.

Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison, New York, NY, for Defendant; Robert S. Smith, of counsel

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

SPATT, District Judge.

This case involves a dispute between Arista Technologies, Inc. (the "plaintiff" or "Arista") and Arthur D. Little Enterprises, Inc. (the "defendant" or "ADLE") regarding the licensing agreement of patented technology owned by ADLE. The technology in question, which may revolutionize the way we watch and video-tape our favorite television programs or sporting events, would miraculously allow video...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases