COLEMAN, J.
Dennis Koher appeals the division of property acquired during his meretricious relationship with Mary Morgan, contending that the trial court erred in applying the commingling rule to profits from his separate business. Koher argues that Morgan does not have an ownership interest in the property he acquired during their relationship or in its increased value after their separation. We find that the trial court correctly applied
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.