1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 969 S.W.2d
  5. 969 S.W.2d 914 (1998)
 

GENERAL ELEC. CO. v. PROCESS CONTROL CO.

969 S.W.2d 914 (1998)

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Plaintiff/Respondent, v. PROCESS CONTROL COMPANY, Defendant/Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Tennessee, at Nashville.

June 8, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Randolph Bibb, Jr., Nashville, Thomas G. Cooper, Boston, MA, for Plaintiff-Respondent.

Clinton V. Butler, Jr., Jerry D. Kizer, Jr., Dale Conder, Jr., Jackson, for Defendant-Petitioner.

OPINION

HOLDER, Justice.

This case comes to us on a certified question of law. The plaintiff, General Electric Company ("G.E."), filed this action for contribution against Process Control Company ("Process Control"). Process Control filed a motion to dismiss and/or motion for summary judgment arguing that Tennessee law does not permit a right of contribution in this case. The district court entered an order requesting this Court to address the following...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases