TOWN OF HINESBURG v. DUNKLING

No. 96-632.

711 A.2d 1163 (1998)

TOWN OF HINESBURG v. Paul DUNKLING.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

April 10, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip C. Woodward and Douglas D. LeBrun of Dinse, Erdmann, Knapp & McAndrew, P.C., Burlington, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Liam L. Murphy and Eric M. Knudson of Langrock Sperry & Wool, Middlebury, for Defendant-Appellant.

Priscilla B. Fox, Montpelier, for Amicus Curiae Vermont League of Cities and Towns.

Before AMESTOY, C.J., DOOLEY, MORSE, JOHNSON and SKOGLUND, JJ.


SKOGLUND, Justice.

Defendant/landowner Paul Dunkling appeals the Chittenden Superior Court's grant of plaintiff/cross-appellant Town of Hinesburg's summary judgment motion and grant of Town's request for a mandatory injunction and fine for noncompliance with a town zoning bylaw. Landowner contends that: (1) Town's notice that the zoning board of adjustment (ZBA) had rendered a decision was insufficient to raise the bar of 24 V.S.A. § 4472 in Town's subsequent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases