NOTT, Associate Justice.
This case involves the question of whether an insurance carrier has the obligation to defend an employee who is charged with embezzling funds from the insured-employer. In this opinion, we hold that the appellant-employee is an additional insured under the insurance policy. We also hold that the express terms of the insurance policy require a defense and do not exclude claims or litigation between insureds.
STANDARD OF REVIEW
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.