BENNETT v. BAUGH

No. A91803.

961 P.2d 883 (1998)

154 Or. App. 397

J. William BENNETT, Appellant— Cross-Respondent, v. Gerald Roland BAUGH and Virginia Mae Baugh, Respondents— Cross-Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 10, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan M. Radmacher, argued the cause for appellant—cross-respondent. With him on the briefs was McEwen, Gisvold, Rankin, Carter & Streinz, LLP., Portland.

Charles A. Ringo, Beaverton, argued the cause and filed the briefs for respondents— cross-appellants.

Before De MUNIZ, P.J., and HASELTON and LINDER, JJ.


LINDER, Judge.

This appeal arises out of a breach of contract action. The dispute at trial centered on the validity and enforceability of a promissory note that plaintiff, an attorney, negotiated with defendants to secure payment for plaintiff's legal services. At the time the note was negotiated, plaintiff represented a corporation in which defendants were the sole shareholders. By signing the note, defendants personally obligated themselves to pay for the legal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases