PER CURIAM.
Leonard Lederman appeals the trial court's order denying his motion to vacate a clerk's default. We are unpersuaded that the trial court erred in declining to accept Lederman and his counsel's unsworn "affidavits" as a basis for showing excusable neglect, and therefore affirm.
With regard to the "affidavits," the attestations fail to state that the affiants swore to the truth of the contents, or even took an oath. See Scott v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.