ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM. v. WEBSTER

Misc. AG No. 71, Sept. Term, 1996.

705 A.2d 1135 (1998)

348 Md. 662

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND v. Arthur Dixon WEBSTER.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

February 17, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Melvin Hirshman, Bar Counsel, and Kendall R. Calhoun, Asst. Bar Counsel, for Attorney Grievance Com'n of Maryland, for petitioner.

Andrew J. Graham, Baltimore, for respondent.

Argued before BELL, C.J., ELDRIDGE, RODOWSKY, CHASANOW, RAKER and WILNER, JJ., and ROBERT L. KARWACKI, Judge (retired), Specially Assigned.


RAKER, Judge.

Acting through Bar Counsel, the Attorney Grievance Commission filed a petition for disciplinary action against Arthur Dixon Webster for violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct. Pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-709(b),1 we referred the matter to Judge Thomas C. Groton, III of the Circuit Court for Wicomico County to make findings of fact and conclusions of law. Following an evidentiary hearing, Judge Groton concluded that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases