1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 704 So.2d
  5. 704 So.2d 1117 (1998)
 

HAAS v. ROE

No. 96-05150.

704 So.2d 1117 (1998)

Raymond A. HAAS, Appellant, v. Michael ROE, Joseph Patsko, Bruce Austin, Paul Ley, and Haas, Austin, Ley, Roe & Patsko, Inc., a Florida corporation, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

January 16, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kevin H. O'Neill of Haas, Ramey & Beik, Tampa, for Appellant.

Joseph T. Patsko and Michael A. Roe, Tampa, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The appellant, Raymond A. Haas, challenges the final judgments entered in favor of appellees, Michael A. Roe and Joseph T. Patsko. We agree that the trial court erred in entering final judgments in favor of Roe and Patsko and reverse and remand.

The appellant filed a complaint against his former law firm, Haas, Austin, Ley, Roe and Patsko, Inc. (HALRP), a Florida corporation, as well as his former law partners, Bruce Austin, Paul Ley, Michael Roe...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases