CTO v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP.

No. 20324-3-II.

951 P.2d 812 (1998)

CONCERNED TAXPAYERS OPPOSED TO THE MODIFIED MIDSOUTH SEQUIM BYPASS, an unincorporated Washington association; Maurice S. Sherk and Frances H. Sherk, Appellants, v. STATE of Washington, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION; and State of Washington, Washington Transportation Commission, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2.

February 20, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anne Louise Spangler, Atty. Gen. Office Transp. Div., Olympia, for Respondent.

Lawrence Charles Watters, Columbia Riv. Gorge Comm., White Salmon, for Amicus Curiae Washington Trust for Historic Preservation.

Mark Stephen Beaufait, Brown & Beaufait Ps, Port Townsend, for Appellant.


ARMSTRONG, Judge.

The Washington State Department of Transportation (DOT) has long planned to build a bypass for State Route 101 around downtown Sequim. As required by the State Environmental Protection Act, the DOT prepared an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), which was presented in its final form (FEIS) to the Transportation Commission to get approval of the project. The FEIS presented four alternative routes, with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases