MICKLE, Judge.
Appellant challenges his convictions and sentences imposed following remand from an earlier appeal. While we do not find the prison and probationary terms imposed after appellant's successful appeal to be impermissibly harsher than the original sentences, we do conclude that the imposition of restitution for the first time on remand constituted a prohibited enhancement. See Brooks v. State,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.