PER CURIAM.
The appellant asserts five grounds in support of his argument that his request for postconviction relief should have been granted. We find no merit in any issue raised by the appellant and affirm the trial court's denial of postconviction relief. However, we find that the State is correct that there is a scrivener's error in the appellant's judgment; there is no indication of the basis for the adjudication of guilt. The judgment should show that the appellant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
