HILL v. TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSIT

WCB 94-09247, 94-09245, 94-09246; CA A92343.

962 P.2d 758 (1998)

154 Or. App. 544

In the Matter of the Compensation of William B. Hill, Claimant. William B. HILL, Petitioner, v. TRI-COUNTY METROPOLITAN TRANSIT DISTRICT OF OREGON (TRI-MET), Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 24, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dennis O'Malley argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner, N.A.

Travis Terrall, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Terrall & Associates.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and ARMSTRONG, JJ.


EDMONDS, Judge.

Claimant seeks review of an order of the Worker's Compensation Board denying his occupational disease claim relating to his left shoulder. The only medical evidence that supports compensability is the opinion of claimant's treating physician. The Board found that opinion not persuasive and ruled that claimant had not carried his burden of demonstrating compensability. We review for substantial evidence and errors of law, ORS 183.482(7) and (8), and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases