EMPLOYMENT DEPT. v. HEMKE

96-AB-2481, 97-AB-127; CA A96297.

963 P.2d 750 (1998)

155 Or. App. 303

EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT, Petitioner, v. Edward E. HEMKE and Electro-Static Refinishers, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 5, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael C. Livingston, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for Petitioner. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

James N. Esterkin, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for Respondent Edward E. Hemke.

No appearance for Respondent Electro-Static Refinishers.

Before WARREN, P.J., DEITS, C.J., and LANDAU, J.


DEITS, Chief Judge.

Petitioner Employment Department seeks review of the order of the Employment Appeals Board (EAB) determining that claimant was entitled to unemployment benefits because he was discharged. Petitioner requests reversal of EAB's order and remand to consider whether claimant had good cause to leave work under ORS 657.176(2)(c). We reverse and remand.

Claimant was employed by a corporation, Electro-Static Refinishers, from September 1, 1986...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases