STATE v. PREMSINGH

C9412-37982; CA A93385.

962 P.2d 732 (1998)

154 Or. App. 682

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Vidya Anil PREMSINGH, aka Anil Mark Premsingh, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon, In Banc.

Resubmitted February 11, 1998.

Decided June 24, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George G. Curtis, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Jonathan H. Fussner, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.


Taken In Banc and Resubmitted February 11, 1998.

ARMSTRONG, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. He assigns error to the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence. We reverse.

On November 13, 1994, defendant's sister called the police because defendant was scaring her. Portland police officers Woodward and Krantz responded to the call. When the officers arrived, defendant's sister told them...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases