1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 709 A.2d
  5. 709 A.2d 980 (1998)
 

AT&T v. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COM'N

709 A.2d 980 (1998)

AT&T, Petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, Respondent. SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P., Petitioner, v. PENNSYLVANIA PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION, Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided March 18, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Craig A. Doll, Harrisburg, for petitioner, AT&T.

Kevin J. McKeon, Harrisburg, for petitioner, Sprint Communications.

Lawrence F. Barth, Harrisburg, for respondent.

Christopher D. Loizides, Philadelphia, for intervenor, Delaware & Hudson Railway Co., Inc.

Before SMITH and PELLEGRINI, JJ., and NARICK, Senior Judge.

PELLEGRINI, Judge.

AT&T and Sprint Communications Company L.P. (Sprint)1 appeal an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (Commission)2 denying them reimbursement of their costs for relocating fiber optic cables at five rail-highway crossings.3

I.

This case emanates from the need by Delaware and Hudson...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases