1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 963 S.W.2d
  5. 963 S.W.2d 725 (1998)
 

STATE v. RODGERS

Nos. 73149, 73150.

963 S.W.2d 725 (1998)

STATE of Missouri, Appellant, v. David RODGERS and Charles Dailey, Respondents.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Writ Division Five.

March 24, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Deborah Van Arink, Asst. Circuit Atty., St. Louis, for appellant.

William Goldstein, St. Louis, for respondent David Rodgers.

David Bruns, St. Louis, for respondent Charles Dailey.

Before KAROHL, P.J., and SIMON and JAMES R. DOWD, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

We have jurisdiction to consider the state's appeal of an order sustaining defendants' motions to suppress eyewitness identification testimony. Section 547.200 RSMo 1994. We do not have authority to review the two claims of trial court error as matters of abuse of discretion. The points on appeal addressed to abuse of discretion do not preserve anything for review because we do not review the suppression of evidence as a matter of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases