1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 963 P.2d
  5. 963 P.2d 712 (1998)
 

BERRY v. METRO ELEC. JOINT APPRENTICESHIP

CA A93976.

963 P.2d 712 (1998)

155 Or. App. 26

Cardis C. BERRY, Petitioner, v. METRO ELECTRICAL JOINT APPRENTICESHIP & TRAINING COMMITTEE, a State Agency, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 15, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard C. Busse, Portland, argued the cause for Petitioner. With him on the opening brief were Scott N. Hunt and Busse & Hunt.

Richard D. Wasserman, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause and filed the brief for Respondent. With him on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and ARMSTRONG, JJ.

WARREN, Presiding Judge.

The issue in this case is whether we have jurisdiction to review a decision by the Metro Electrical Joint Apprenticeship & Training Committee (the Committee), which terminated an apprenticeship agreement with Cardis Berry, a probationary apprentice electrician. Specifically, the question is whether the Committee's termination of the apprentice agreement was a final order in a contested case subject to the contested case procedures of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases