1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 962 P.2d
  5. 962 P.2d 701 (1998)
 

HOLLAND v. CITY OF CANNON BEACH

LUBA No. 79-079; CA A100752.

962 P.2d 701 (1998)

154 Or. App. 450

David HOLLAND, Petitioner, v. CITY OF CANNON BEACH, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 17, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William C. Cox, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.

Daniel Kearns, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Preston Gates & Ellis, LLP.

Before RIGGS, P.J., and LANDAU and WOLLHEIM, JJ.

RIGGS, Presiding Judge.

Petitioner Holland seeks review of LUBA's decision affirming the City of Cannon Beach's denial of his application for a subdivision. We reverse.

Petitioner filed his application in September 1994. The city's initial disposition was to deny the application on the ground that the proposed subdivision did not comply with various provisions of the city's comprehensive plan. Petitioner appealed the city's decision and, after the case made...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases