MEEHAN v. K.D. PARTNERS, L.P.


722 A.2d 938 (1998)

317 N.J. Super. 563

James P. MEEHAN, Plaintiff, v. K.D. PARTNERS, L.P., and Planning Board of the Borough of Longport, Defendants-Respondents. Thaddeus J. Bartkowski, Intervenor-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 18, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thaddeus J. Bartkowski, intervenor-appellant, argued the cause pro se.

Stephen Hankin, Atlantic City, for defendant-respondent K.D. Partners, L.P. (Hankin, Sandson, Sandman, Bradley & Palladino, attorneys; Mr. Hankin, on the brief).

John Scott Abbott, Margate City, for defendant-respondent Planning Board (Mr. Scott, filed a statement joining in the brief of co-defendant-respondent K.D. Partners, L.P.).

L. Gilbert Farr, submitted a brief on behalf of amicus curiae Longport Civic Association.

Before Judges LONG, WEFING and CARCHMAN.


CARCHMAN, J.A.D.

Defendant K.D. Partners, L.P. (K.D.) sought a use variance from defendant Planning Board of the Borough of Longport (the Board) to allow the conversion of an existing hotel to an eight-unit hotel with kitchen facilities. The application also sought relief from certain bulk requirements imposed by the zoning ordinance. The application was successful, but a neighboring property owner, plaintiff James P. Meehan, filed an action in lieu of prerogative...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases