MARKLEY v. SEMLE


713 A.2d 945 (1998)

1998 ME 145

John E. MARKLEY, et al. v. Scott B. SEMLE, et al.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Decided June 10, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James A. Hopkinson, Portland, for plaintiffs.

Richard A. Hull, III, Biddeford, for defendants.

Before WATHEN, C.J., and ROBERTS, CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, DANA, LIPEZ, and SAUFLEY, JJ.


LIPEZ, Justice.

[¶ 1] The plaintiffs, John and Mary Markley, appeal from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (York County, Fritzsche J.) in favor of the defendants, Scott and Debra Semle. The Markleys contend, inter alia, that the court erred in concluding that they had failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence the location of the common boundary between their property and the Semles' property. Finding no error, we affirm.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases