1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 134 F.3d
  5. 134 F.3d 1481 (1998)
 

TEXTILE PRODUCTIONS, INC. v. MEAD CORP.

No. 97-1245.

134 F.3d 1481 (1998)

TEXTILE PRODUCTIONS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MEAD CORPORATION and Fiber Trim Sewing Company, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing Declined March 24, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Warren Roddis, Attorney, Grosse Pointe Farms, Michigan, argued, for plaintiff-appellant.

Scott A. King, Thompson Hine & Flory LLP, Dayton, Ohio, argued, for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief was Mark P. Levy.

Before LOURIE, Circuit Judge, ARCHER, Senior Circuit Judge, and RADER, Circuit Judge.

Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc Declined March 24, 1998.

RADER, Circuit Judge.

The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan dismissed Textile Production, Inc.'s (Textile's) complaint with prejudice in favor of The Mead Corporation (Mead) and Fiber Trim Sewing Company (Fiber Trim). Because Textile is not an exclusive licensee and therefore has no standing to sue for patent infringement, this court affirms the district...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases