ABRAMS v. CADES, SCHUTTE, FLEMING & WRIGHT

No. 21062.

966 P.2d 631 (1998)

88 Hawai`i 319

Arnold R. ABRAMS and Richard I. Blum, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CADES, SCHUTTE, FLEMING & WRIGHT, a Hawai`i partnership, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Hawai`i.

September 18, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur R. Roeca and David M. Louie of Roeca, Louie & Hiraoka for defendant-appellant.

Paul Alston and Lea Hong of Alston Hunt Floyd & Ing for plaintiffs-appellees.

Before MOON, C.J., KLEIN, LEVINSON, NAKAYAMA, and RAMIL, JJ.


NAKAYAMA, Justice.

Defendant-appellant Cades, Schutte, Fleming and Wright, a Hawai`i partnership (Cades), appeals from an order of the circuit court compelling production of a document. The court ordered Cades to produce a letter over a claim that the letter was protected by the attorney-client privilege.

We dismiss this appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction. This is an interlocutory appeal and was neither certified by the circuit court under Hawai`i Rules...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases