JOVINE v. FHP, INC.

Docket No. B105314.

64 Cal.App.4th 1506 (1998)

KATHY V. JOVINE, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. FHP, INC., et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

June 24, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Daniel Romano and Kenneth H. Moss for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, Deborah C. Saxe and John P. LeCrone for Defendants and Respondents.


OPINION

CROSKEY, J.

This is a case about due process of law. Plaintiff Leo Baumohl1 appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of his employer, FHP, Inc. (FHP), and his supervisor, Charles Kiskaden (Kiskaden; collectively, defendants) after the trial court confirmed and adopted the decisions of a court-appointed referee on three motions for summary adjudication filed by the defendants.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases