1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 997 F.Supp.
  5. 997 F.Supp. 556 (1998)
 

C.R. BARD, INC. v. GUIDANT CORP.

No. CIV. A. 97-305-RRM.

997 F.Supp. 556 (1998)

C.R. BARD INC. Plaintiff, v. GUIDANT CORPORATION and ADVANCED CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

February 27, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jack B. Blumenfeld, Morris, Nichols, Arsth & Tunnell, Wilmington, DE, John F. Sweeney, Richard C. Komson and John T. Gallagher, Morgan & Finnegan, New York City, for Plaintiff.

Frederick L. Cottrell, III and Jeffrey L. Moyer, Richards, Layton & Finger, Wilmington, DE, Richard A. Bardin, Craig B. Bailey and John K. Fitzgerald, Fulwider Patton Lee & Utecht, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants.

OPINION

MCKELVIE, District Judge.

This is a patent case. Plaintiff C.R. Bard, Inc. ("Bard") is a corporation organized under the laws of New Jersey and has its principal place of business in Murray Hill, New Jersey. Bard is the owner of U.S. Patent No. RE. 33,561 ("the '561 patent") and U.S. Patent No. RE. 32,983 ("the '983 patent"). Both patents claim the invention of a certain type of dilatation balloon catheter. Defendant Guidant Corporation ("Guidant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases