1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 714 A.2d
  5. 714 A.2d 829 (1998)
 

HAMILL v. BAY BRIDGE ASSOCIATES

714 A.2d 829 (1998)

1998 ME 181

William D. HAMILL v. BAY BRIDGE ASSOCIATES et al.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.

Decided July 22, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

F. Bruce Sleeper (orally), Jensen, Baird, Gardner & Henry, Portland, for plaintiff.

Timothy H. Norton (orally), Richard W. Mulhern, U. Charles Remmel, II, Kelly, Remmel & Zimmerman, Portland, for defendants.

Before WATHEN, C.J., and ROBERTS, CLIFFORD, RUDMAN, DANA, and SAUFLEY, JJ.

ROBERTS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Bay Bridge Associates appeals from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Mills, J.) denying its motion pursuant to M.R. Civ. P. 60 for relief from the judgment entered in favor of William D. Hamill. On appeal, Bay Bridge contends that it did not stipulate to a judgment in Hamill's favor and that the stipulation for and confession of judgment offered by Hamill and adopted by the court should have been rejected...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases