1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 160 F.3d
  5. 160 F.3d 1373 (1998)
 

3D SYSTEMS, INC. v. AAROTECH LABORATORIES, INC.

No. 97-1514.

160 F.3d 1373 (1998)

3D SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AAROTECH LABORATORIES, INC., Aaroflex, Inc. and Albert C. Young, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

November 12, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard J. Codding, Loeb & Loeb LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued, for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Stuart Lubitz and Don F. Livornese.

Charles G. Smith, Kinsella, Boesch, Fujikawa & Towle, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, argued, for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were George T. Kliavkoff and Anna Kogan.

Before NEWMAN, BRYSON, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.

GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.

DECISION

3D Systems, Inc. (3D) appeals the decision of the United States District Court for the Central District of California dismissing its complaint against Aarotech Laboratories, Inc. (Aarotech), Aaroflex, Inc. (Aaroflex), and Albert C. Young (Young) for lack of personal jurisdiction. See 3D Sys., Inc. v. Aarotech Lab., Inc., No. CV 97-0231-WDK (C.D.Cal. July 23, 1997). We affirm the district court's determination that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases