1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 79 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 79 Cal.Rptr.2d 73 (1998)
 

MARK K. v. ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP

No. B114274.

79 Cal.Rptr.2d 73 (1998)

67 Cal.App.4th 603

MARK K., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF LOS ANGELES, Defendant and Respondent. And eight other cases.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division One.

As Modified on Denial of Rehearing October 28, 1998.

Review Denied January 27, 1999.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Blum & Roseman, Mark E. Roseman, Orange, Ross & Rubino and Stephen C. Rubino, Westmont, NJ, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

McNicholas & McNicholas, John P. McNicholas and David M. Ring, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Respondent.

MASTERSON, Associate Justice.

We affirm judgments entered in nine consolidated actions following an order sustaining the demurrers of the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Los Angeles, a corporation sole (hereafter "the church"), without leave to amend.

STANDARD OF REVIEW

In reviewing the sustaining of a demurrer, "we are guided by long-settled rules. `We treat the demurrer as admitting all material facts properly pleaded, but not contentions, deductions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases