LINDSTEDT v. CITY OF CANNON BEACH

LUBA No. 96-134; CA A99519.

952 P.2d 574 (1998)

152 Or. App. 489

Norman L. LINDSTEDT and Merrinell Lindstedt, Petitioners, v. CITY OF CANNON BEACH, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 11, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Norman L. Lindstedt, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioners. With him on the brief was Lindstedt, Buono & Welch.

William R. Canessa, Seaside, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent. With him on the brief was Campbell, Moberg, Canessa, Faber & Hooley, P.C.

Before LANDAU, P.J., and DEITS, C.J., and LEESON, J.


PER CURIAM.

Petitioners seek review of LUBA's decision affirming the City of Cannon Beach's denial of a permit that petitioners sought to remove a tree located on their residential property. Petitioners' principal contention is that the city exceeded its regulatory authority by denying the permit and by requiring a permit to remove a single tree from their backyard.

The city's zoning ordinance contains provisions pertaining to the removal of trees. Paragraph...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases