1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 155 F.3d
  5. 155 F.3d 1364 (1998)
 

SCHMELZER v. OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE

No. 98-6001.

155 F.3d 1364 (1998)

Gerard J. SCHMELZER, Petitioner, v. OFFICE OF COMPLIANCE, Respondent, and Office of the Chief Administrative Officer of the United States House of Representatives, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

September 17, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel J. Tobin, Kirkpatrick & Lockhart LLP, Washington, DC, argued for petitioner.

Gary Green, General Counsel, Office of Compliance, of Washington, DC, argued for respondent, Office of Compliance. Of counsel was Mary Masulla, Attorney, Office of General Counsel.

Michael L. Stern, Senior Counsel, Office General Counsel, U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, DC, argued for respondent, Office of Chief Administrative Officer.

Before RADER, Circuit Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

Gerard J. Schmelzer petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Directors of the Office of Compliance (Board), which held that he was not entitled to relief for an alleged violation of section 205 of the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995(CAA), 2 U.S.C. § 1315. Because we agree with the Board that Mr. Schmelzer was not denied any rights granted to him under the pertinent statutory and regulatory provisions, we affirm.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases