NEENAN v. HARTFORD


256 A.D.2d 1247 (1998)

682 N.Y.S.2d 783

THOMAS NEENAN, Respondent, v. ITT HARTFORD, Successor in Interest to HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant, and SERGIO J. RIZZO, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

Decided December 31, 1998.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

We affirm for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court (Siracuse, J.). We add only that there is no merit to the contention of defendant Sergio Joseph Rizzo that, in the absence of a written assignment of the life insurance policy, plaintiff's wife retained the authority to change the policy's beneficiary (see, General Obligations Law § 5-701 [a] [9]). An insurance policy is a chose in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases