1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 136 F.3d
  5. 136 F.3d 1354 (1998)
 

IMAGE TECHNICAL SERVICE, INC. v. EASTMAN KODAK CO.

No. 96-16014.

136 F.3d 1354 (1998)

IMAGE TECHNICAL SERVICE, INC.; J-E-S-P Company, Inc.; Shields Business Machines, Inc.; Micrographic Services, Inc.; Omni Micrographic Services, Inc.; Atlanta General Microfilm Co., Inc; Datek Ltd.; B.C.S. Technical Services, Inc.; CPO Ltd., Inc.; Advanced Systems Service, Inc.; Amtech Equipment Maintenance, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. EASTMAN KODAK CO., Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Withdrawn from Submission January 21, 1998.

Resubmitted February 24, 1998.

Decided February 27, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John R. Reese, San Francisco, California, for defendant-appellant.

Donald R. Pepperman, Los Angeles, California, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Before: FLETCHER, REINHARDT, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:

Image Technical Service, Inc. and other companies ("Image Tech") filed an antitrust suit against Eastman Kodak Co. ("Kodak"). Before trial, Kodak moved to disqualify Coudert Brothers, a law firm representing Image Tech, because the firm represented a division of Kodak in other matters. The district court disqualified Coudert from further representation of Image Tech. Image Tech eventually won the lawsuit. In this appeal, Kodak seeks to reverse...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases