1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 81 Ohio
  5. 81 Ohio St.3d 67 (1998)
 

WESTHAVEN, INC. v. WOOD CTY., BD. OF REVISION

No. 97-357.

81 Ohio St.3d 67 (1998)

WESTHAVEN, INC., APPELLEE, v. WOOD COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 11, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Todd W. Sleggs & Associates, Todd W. Sleggs and Susan K. French-Scaggs, for appellee.

Teaford, Rich & Wheeler and James R. Gorry, for appellants.

Per Curiam.

Appellants' initial contention is that the BTA erred in accepting Davis's appraisal because he did not provide all the facts and figures necessary to back up his opinion of value. We disagree.

Appellants cite as the legal basis for their contention Rollman & Sons Co. v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Revision (1955), 163 Ohio St. 363, 56 O.O. 337, 127 N.E.2d 1. The taxpayer's expert in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases