1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 956 P.2d
  5. 956 P.2d 529 (1998)
 

GODDARD v. SUPERIOR COURT

No. 1 CA-SA 97-0378.

956 P.2d 529 (1998)

191 Ariz. 402

Cicero N. GODDARD, Petitioner, v. SUPERIOR COURT of the State of Arizona, In and For the COUNTY OF MARICOPA, the Honorable Alan S. Kamin, a judge thereof, Respondent Judge, Richard M. ROMLEY, County Attorney, Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C.

Review Denied May 19, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dean W. Trebesch, Maricopa County Public Defender by Hilary G. Berko, Deputy Public Defender, Phoenix, for Petitioner.

Richard M. Romley, Maricopa County Attorney by Patricia A. Nigro, Deputy County Attorney, Phoenix, for Real Party in Interest.

FIDEL, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 Does Proposition 200 mandate probation for a person convicted of possession of a narcotic drug when the person has been convicted of two prior offenses of possession of narcotic drugs for sale? That question is presented in this special action. We accept jurisdiction because the question is one of first impression, of statewide importance, and likely to recur. See Snow v. Superior Court, 183 Ariz. 320

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases