1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 153 F.3d
  5. 153 F.3d 1308 (1998)
 

WATKINS v. SVERDRUP TECHNOLOGY, INC.

No. 97-2104.

153 F.3d 1308 (1998)

William O. WATKINS, William R. Mallory, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SVERDRUP TECHNOLOGY, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

September 11, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bradley S. Odom, John Barry Kelly, II, Kievit, Kelly & Odom, Pensacola, FL, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Margaret Catherine Rodgers, Donald H. Partington, Clark, Partington, Hart, Larry, Bond, Stackhouse & Stone, Pensacola, FL, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, and GODBOLD and RONEY, Senior Circuit Judges.

HATCHETT, Chief Judge:

Appellants William Watkins and William Mallory challenge the district court's entry of judgment as a matter of law on their claims of discriminatory discharge in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 623(a)(1) (1994). Finding no substantial conflict in the evidence that appellee Sverdrup Technology, Inc., terminated Watkins and Mallory under a bona fide — albeit unconventional — reduction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases