1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 256 A.D.2d
  5. 256 A.D.2d 1198 (1998)
 

HOLTZ v. ALDRIDGE

256 A.D.2d 1198 (1998)

683 N.Y.S.2d 451

LINDA HOLTZ, Appellant, v. JANERIO D. ALDRIDGE et al., Respondents. (Appeal No. 1.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

Decided December 31, 1998.

Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum:

Plaintiff's sole contention on appeal is that various remarks by defense counsel in summation were so unfair and prejudicial as to require a new trial. Plaintiff failed to move for a mistrial until after the jury rendered its verdict, and thus the motion was untimely (see, Taylor v Dayton Suregrip & Shore Co., 64 A.D.2d 809, 810). Although the remarks by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases