RECOVERY HOUSE VI v. CITY OF EUGENE

LUBA 97-021; CA A102517.

965 P.2d 488 (1998)

156 Or. App. 509

RECOVERY HOUSE VI, Petitioner, v. CITY OF EUGENE, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 14, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael E. Farthing, Eugene, argued the cause for Petitioner. With him on the brief was Gleaves Swearingen Larsen Potter Scott & Smith.

Jerome Lidz, Eugene, argued the cause for Respondent. With him on the brief was Harrang Long Gary Rudnick.

Before ARMSTRONG, P.J., and DEITS, C.J., and LINDER, J.


ARMSTRONG, Presiding Judge.

Petitioner Recovery House VI seeks review of LUBA's decision affirming the City of Eugene Planning Commission's approval of a conditional use permit for petitioner's operation of a drug and alcohol addiction recovery facility in a suburban residential (RA) zone. Petitioner contends that its proposed use of the property is permitted outright in the zone and, therefore, is not subject to the conditions that the city attached to its allowance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases