JOHNSON v. UNEMPLOY. COMP. BD. OF REVIEW


723 A.2d 730 (1998)

Kenneth JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION BOARD OF REVIEW, Respondent. David Hallman, Petitioner, v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided December 9, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael W. McGurrin, Philadelphia, for petitioner.

John A. DiNome, Philadelphia, for respondent.

Before COLINS, President Judge, DOYLE, J., SMITH, J., FRIEDMAN, J., KELLEY, J., FLAHERTY, J., and LEADBETTER, J.


KELLEY, Judge.

In these consolidated appeals,1 the issue before this court is whether a claimant who is receiving unemployment compensation benefits during a work stoppage and chooses to retire should continue receiving benefits.

Kenneth Johnson and David Hallman (hereinafter referred to collectively as claimants) appeal from two separate orders of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review which affirm the referee's denial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases