ELIZABETHTOWN WATER CO. v. HARTFORD CAS. INS. CO.

No. CIV. A. 95-3326.

998 F.Supp. 447 (1998)

ELIZABETHTOWN WATER COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and Centennial Insurance Company, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. New Jersey.

Opinion Denying Reargument May 29, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl R. Woodward, III, Carella, Byrne, Bain, Gilfillan, Cecchi & Stewart, Roseland, NJ, for Plaintiff.

Robert D. Kretzer, Lamb, Hartung, Kretzer, Reinman & Depascale, Jersey City, NJ, for Defendant Hartford.

Wendy Lee Mager, Smith, Stratton, Wise, Heher & Brennen, Princeton, NJ, for Defendant Centennial.


OPINION

WOLIN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Centennial Insurance Co.'s ("Centennial") motion for summary judgment on Elizabethtown Water Company's ("Elizabethtown") claims for indemnity. Hartford Casualty Insurance Company ("Hartford") also moves for summary judgment of Elizabethtown's claims for indemnity. The Court has decided these motions upon the written submissions of the parties pursuant to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases