ORDER
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals after sentence on charge of robbery first degree, section 569.020 RSMo 1994. The trial court did not err in overruling motions to suppress identification testimony and did not err, plain or otherwise, in permitting a police office to testify regarding any differences in a physical description of the robber and of defendant. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The sentence as a prior offender to...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
