1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 137 F.3d
  5. 137 F.3d 1300 (1998)
 

GROSSFELD v. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COM'N

Nos. 96-4356, 96-5525.

137 F.3d 1300 (1998)

Kenneth GROSSFELD, Murray Stein, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Kenneth R. GROSSFELD and Murray L. Stein, Petitioners, v. The COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

March 27, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michel O. Weisz, Albornoz, Secredo & Weisz, Coral Gables, FL, for Grossfeld and Stein.

James T. Kelly, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Laura V. Rubino, Larry D. Gasteiger, Laura J. Vallance, John Batterman, Office of General Counsel, Office of the Commodity Future Trading Comm., Div. of Enforcement, Washington, DC, for Defendants-Appellees and Respondent.

Before ANDERSON and CARNES, Circuit Judges, and O'KELLEY, Senior District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Petitioners-Appellants Kenneth R. Grossfeld and Murray L. Stein request a review of an order of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.1 They argue that the separate monetary penalties levied against them by the National Futures Association ("NFA") and the Commodities Futures Trading Commission ("Commission") violated the Double Jeopardy Clause. The Double Jeopardy challenge is the only issue presented by appellants in this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases