CITIZENS' UTILITY BOARD v. PUC

94C-10372, 94C-10417, 95C-11300, 95C-12542, CA A86940 (Control), CA A86973, CA A92935, CA A93400.

971 P.2d 459 (1998)

157 Or. App. 409

CITIZENS' UTILITY BOARD OF OREGON, an independent nonprofit public corporation, Appellant, Public Power Council, Intervenor—Appellant, v. PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON, Respondent, Portland General Electric Company, Intervenor—Respondent. Utility Reform Project, Colleen O'Neil and Lloyd K. Marbet, Appellants, v. Oregon Public Utility Commission, Respondent, Portland General Electric Co., Intervenor—Respondent. Citizens' Utility Board of Oregon, an independent nonprofit public corporation, Respondent—Cross-Respondent, v. Public Utility Commission of Oregon, Cross—Appellant, Portland General Electric Co., Intervenor-Defendant—Appellant—Cross-Respondent. Utility Reform Project and Colleen O'Neil, Respondent-Cross-Appellants, v. Public Utility Commission of Oregon, Appellant—Cross-Respondent, Portland General Electric Co., Intervenor-Defendant—Appellant—Cross-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 9, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel W. Meek, Portland, filed the petition for appellants Utility Reform Project, Colleen O'Neil and Lloyd K. Marbet, and respondents—cross-appellants Utility Reform Project and Colleen O'Neil.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Michael D. Reynolds, Solicitor General, and Jas. Adams, Assistant Attorney General, filed the response for respondent Public Utility Commission.

John R. Faust, Portland, and Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, P.C., filed the response for intervenor-respondent Portland General Electric Company.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and DEITS, Chief Judge, and ARMSTRONG, Judge.


On Petition of Appellants Utility Reform Project, Colleen O'Neil and Lloyd K. Marbet for Attorney Fees August 31, 1998.

DEITS, C.J.

Petitioners O'Neil, Marbet and Utility Reform Project (collectively petitioners) were among the prevailing parties in Citizens' Utility Board v. PUC, 154 Or.App. 702, 962 P.2d 744 (1998), where, in general terms, we agreed with the opponents of a series...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases